Originated in March this year in Guinea then spread to Liberia and Sierra Leone West Africa, the out-of-control Ebola outbreak death-toll has increased exponentially now reaching well over 4,000 while many countries are indeed on red alert in anticipation of a global pandemic…
Having said that does the evidence surrounding the outbreak suggest a false flag hoax more so now than ever? Let’s look into it.
The False flag hoax and its history
History has shown us that false flags in the form of fake diseases are nothing new. Remember SARS, the bird flu and then there was the so called swine flu..?
Typical of false flags the hidden powers that be had secretly created an enemy in the form of a virus with all the media hype and fear mongering needed to create a mass panic which caused people to rush in for their vaccinations as protection. However, nothing ever came of these diseases because they never existed. The invention of these diseases and mass panic was created for huge profits in vaccine treatment sales.
Here we go again?
-Is Ebola another false flag created to bring down western world countries by fear, introduce more laws that take away your freedom and implement martial law..? What will be put in the vaccine?
I certainly don’t think that false flags are so ‘in the vernacular’ that they won’t be used again.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
We’re not being told by mainstream media that the PCR diagnostic test used to identify the Ebola virus is greatly unreliable and wildly inaccurate. So those said to have Ebola identified by using PCR could be falsely diagnosed. Instead of Ebola, the test could be indicating a number of other conditions such as a heavy cold, flu or reactions to contaminated drinking water…
The inaccuracy of PCR is supported by an August 2014 Department of Defence protocol document entitled “Ebola Zaire (EZ1) rRT-PCR (TaqMan®) Assay on ABI 7500 Fast Dx, LightCycler, & JBAIDS: INSTRUCTION BOOKLET” which can be downloaded online for free.
-Basically, in so many words, it states that the PCR test should only be used as a back up to supporting evidence already confirming Ebola.
Confirming evidence should include signs of blood haemorrhaging, a history based on the likelihood of contracting the disease by means of exposure… further biochemical evidence, signs and symptoms… Then there’s been the ‘presumptive cases of Ebola’ based on evidence not related to the disease.
Why have these protocols been so blatantly ignored?
-At this point you may comment if it’s not Ebola then what are these people dying over.
Instead of thinking in terms of ‘one factor’ it could be a number of factors. It doesn’t have to be one single virus. Could it be related to extreme poverty? That many of the natives may be ill and dying over dysentery, mal-nutrition, parasitic infection or other poverty related illnesses?
I consider the one factor only, a single virus, to be highly suspect…
Big Pharma profits
With the anticipation of a global pandemic, comments have been made such as those by Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases alluding to the manufacture and introduction of a fast-tracked countries-wide Ebola vaccine. It so happens that this guy has an experimental vaccine on the go tied to GlaxoSmithKline. On the subject of ‘who will gain?’ did you know that the WHO (World Health Organization) directors who may well implement mandatory vaccinations throughout the world have ties to pharmaceutical companies? The CDC is another organisation who stands to gain greatly in the potential cash-cow. visit:-https://www.96levels.com/2019/08/how-the-banking-system-started-and-developed-over-the-decades/